If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
15.06.2025 01:13

Revenge porn
Threats of violence
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Fraud
Insurrection
Perjury
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Why don't I get sleep at nights?
HIPAA violations
Trade secrets
False advertising
Atheists who have read the Bible and think that contains immoral things, why do you assume that?
Conspiracy
Child pornography
Insider trading
Terroristic threats
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
And much, much more.
Can you share something that captivates you, whether it's an idea, a discovery, or an invention?
No freedom is absolute.
Revealing classified information